I just don't get his "sum ups". Most people have praised the GH2 and he seems not to like it. He also seems pretty mixed on the X100 too. Maybe he's the real traditional type that doesn't care to go outside the box a little. I dont know.
Actually, he tends to harp on the camera companies quite often for not innovating enough.
My read on his GH2 comment was that it isn't really all that much better than the GH1 ('cept for AF - he ammended his first analysis) and it's hard to find. Therefore, why not just buy a GH1 instead he says.