Foma 200. About half of the roll I shot last week, and exposed correctly... this part of the roll I underexposed a considerable amount, and they were really dark. I'm still finding Foma 200 pretty confusing. You can underexpose it and it has really good shadows that it kind of rolls into... but they're heavy. It's not like HP5 or Tri-X, you don't still have a good dynamic range when underexposed. You have dark, moody photos. I'm beginning to think you should only underexpose Foma 200 when you're after an artistic dark look.What film did you shoot?