I have the SL1. The files are typical Canon, which I personally like and hold up well to ISO 1600, 3200 with a little noise reduction. I am a life-long Canon user so the menus are simple. I like the touchscreen but miss dedicated exposure compensation dial. You can use the screen to change variables and it isn't a big deal but I prefer the dial on the OMD. I also have the 10-18 and it is a really viable ultra-wide angle, build quality is similar to the 18-55 and 55-200. I also think the 55-200 is a great bang for the buck. I used the SL1 in Yosemite last summer. It makes for a light kit with decent files. I printed a couple A2 files from the trip and they, while not as detailed as FF, look really nice. I really hoped Canon would produce a version 2 with a tilt screen, improved OVF, sensor, and dials but looks like they are headed in the mirrorless direction with the M5. So I'm not holding my breath for a version 2 of the SL.