aaronz28
Regular
So - i recently bought a D7100 and a couple Sigma ART lenses - but have been bitten by the Leica bug -
my intro to the Leica world came in the form of a vintage M3 - with it, i got a 35mm f3.5, 50 f2, and 90 collapsable
after having my first 10 rolls of film developed - i'm totally sold on the Leica and am actually considering unloading all my Nikon stuff and getting a digital Leica -
i do not shoot professionally, but totally as a hobby - so yah it would be total overkill =- but thats just kinda how i am.
Interestingly enough - almost every review/comparison i've read puts the D7100 or D610 full frame equal or better than any of the Leica M9 or M240 -
i find this disturbing as in order to get into a used M9 - its 3k unless you find one at a steal.
i get the whole smaller/niche/name etc. - but is a run of the mill Nikon really up to par with a M9 or 240?
Thanks in advance
my intro to the Leica world came in the form of a vintage M3 - with it, i got a 35mm f3.5, 50 f2, and 90 collapsable
after having my first 10 rolls of film developed - i'm totally sold on the Leica and am actually considering unloading all my Nikon stuff and getting a digital Leica -
i do not shoot professionally, but totally as a hobby - so yah it would be total overkill =- but thats just kinda how i am.
Interestingly enough - almost every review/comparison i've read puts the D7100 or D610 full frame equal or better than any of the Leica M9 or M240 -
i find this disturbing as in order to get into a used M9 - its 3k unless you find one at a steal.
i get the whole smaller/niche/name etc. - but is a run of the mill Nikon really up to par with a M9 or 240?
Thanks in advance