Armanius Bring Jack back! Jan 11, 2011 123 Houston, Texas Jack Mar 30, 2013 #1 View attachment 135961 Subscribe to see EXIF info for this image (if available)
F Frank Starling Veteran Jul 22, 2010 43 Mar 30, 2013 #2 46900023 by Amin Sabet, on Flickr 10010017 by Amin Sabet, on Flickr 10010009 by Amin Sabet, on Flickr
46900023 by Amin Sabet, on Flickr 10010017 by Amin Sabet, on Flickr 10010009 by Amin Sabet, on Flickr
F flash Veteran May 6, 2011 103 Gordon Mar 30, 2013 #3 Are you guys rockin' the single coat (SC) or multicoat (MC) versions of this lens. I really like the look in Armanius' first shot. Gordon
Are you guys rockin' the single coat (SC) or multicoat (MC) versions of this lens. I really like the look in Armanius' first shot. Gordon
F Frank Starling Veteran Jul 22, 2010 43 Mar 30, 2013 #4 Mine was MC, and all three of those were from the same roll of Fuji Superia 400 (from Costco) - can't remember which camera...
Mine was MC, and all three of those were from the same roll of Fuji Superia 400 (from Costco) - can't remember which camera...
Armanius Bring Jack back! Jan 11, 2011 123 Houston, Texas Jack Mar 30, 2013 #5 Mine is a SC ... I think! That first photo is one of my all time favorites. Right timing.
TraamisVOS Hall of Famer Supporter! Nov 29, 2010 124 Melbourne, Australia Mar 30, 2013 #6 When I was trying to decide this two years ago, I settled on the MC version because it apparently had higher contrast and produced less flare. I don't know about less flare, I'm getting plenty of it.
When I was trying to decide this two years ago, I settled on the MC version because it apparently had higher contrast and produced less flare. I don't know about less flare, I'm getting plenty of it.
TraamisVOS Hall of Famer Supporter! Nov 29, 2010 124 Melbourne, Australia Mar 30, 2013 #7 Although I think some of the flare might be due to the UV/IR filter which is necessary on the M8s.
Armanius Bring Jack back! Jan 11, 2011 123 Houston, Texas Jack Apr 3, 2013 #9 M6 + Kodak Portra 160NC
F flash Veteran May 6, 2011 103 Gordon Apr 3, 2013 #10 With the MC version L1006928-Edit.jpg by Flash Gordon Photography, on Flickr Gordon
Vidar Veteran Oct 25, 2010 103 Bergen, Norway Vidar Apr 22, 2013 #12 Gamlehaugen #2 by VidarFoto, on Flickr Gamlehaugen #3 by VidarFoto, on Flickr
Vidar Veteran Oct 25, 2010 103 Bergen, Norway Vidar May 6, 2013 #14 The Albert by VidarFoto, on Flickr
Vidar Veteran Oct 25, 2010 103 Bergen, Norway Vidar May 12, 2013 #16 London by VidarFoto, on Flickr London by VidarFoto, on Flickr
F flash Veteran May 6, 2011 103 Gordon Jun 28, 2013 #17 L1000125.jpg by Flash Gordon Photography, on Flickr L1000957.jpg by Flash Gordon Photography, on Flickr Gordon
L1000125.jpg by Flash Gordon Photography, on Flickr L1000957.jpg by Flash Gordon Photography, on Flickr Gordon
BrianS Super Moderator Moderator Apr 3, 2013 124 Jun 28, 2013 #18 Those are just great, and could not be more different from each other. What F-Stop/Shutter speed for the first shot?
Those are just great, and could not be more different from each other. What F-Stop/Shutter speed for the first shot?
F flash Veteran May 6, 2011 103 Gordon Jun 28, 2013 #19 Brian said: Those are just great, and could not be more different from each other. What F-Stop/Shutter speed for the first shot? Click to expand... 18th of a second ISO 160. exif says 1.7 although I'm 95% sure it was shot at f4. 2nd one is f8 @ 1/180th @ ISO 160. Gordon
Brian said: Those are just great, and could not be more different from each other. What F-Stop/Shutter speed for the first shot? Click to expand... 18th of a second ISO 160. exif says 1.7 although I'm 95% sure it was shot at f4. 2nd one is f8 @ 1/180th @ ISO 160. Gordon
C CaptZoom Veteran Mar 22, 2013 18 Jul 8, 2013 #20 Very nice images everyone. Thanks for sharing. It seems the reputation this lens has for being soft is undeserving. I've enjoyed each photo you guys have posted thus far.
Very nice images everyone. Thanks for sharing. It seems the reputation this lens has for being soft is undeserving. I've enjoyed each photo you guys have posted thus far.