Hi folks,
I am off for a year in 2015 to do some travelling around Europe (Western and Eastern) for a youth working holiday and instead of sorting out visas and employment, I'm more concerned about what to bring camera wise.
My X100S is definitely coming with me. I am also bringing my XT1, 35 1.4 and 56 1.2. I feel like I am lacking a wide angle zoom (for versatility). However it looks like the 10-24 is my only option at this point since I do not see the point in the kit lens when I already have my most common focal lengths covered by primes and the 18mm might not be wide enough.
This lens will mainly be used for architecture, wide angle portraits with lots of DoF, street, cityscapes, landscapes (in the order)
Curious to see if anyone else feels the same way.
I'm also considering the 14mm prime but have the following concerns
1. Very little experience with the 21mm FL on an UWA prime
2. The 16mm 1.4 is coming out next yearish, and the slightly tighter FoV and much faster aperture is very tempting.
3. Might not be as versatile as the 10-24 having 21, 24, 28, and 35 all in one lens.
4. The price difference is negligible (less than 75 USD) in my country for the 14 2.8 and 10 - 24. So for about 75 USD more, I can get the zoom
This will be my first ever zoom since my 18-135 on my Nikon D700 a few years ago, started using primes and never looked back, however now that I will be travelling, the versatility just seems like such a boon. I have my X100S, 35, and 56 for when I need to get my fix
I am off for a year in 2015 to do some travelling around Europe (Western and Eastern) for a youth working holiday and instead of sorting out visas and employment, I'm more concerned about what to bring camera wise.
My X100S is definitely coming with me. I am also bringing my XT1, 35 1.4 and 56 1.2. I feel like I am lacking a wide angle zoom (for versatility). However it looks like the 10-24 is my only option at this point since I do not see the point in the kit lens when I already have my most common focal lengths covered by primes and the 18mm might not be wide enough.
This lens will mainly be used for architecture, wide angle portraits with lots of DoF, street, cityscapes, landscapes (in the order)
Curious to see if anyone else feels the same way.
I'm also considering the 14mm prime but have the following concerns
1. Very little experience with the 21mm FL on an UWA prime
2. The 16mm 1.4 is coming out next yearish, and the slightly tighter FoV and much faster aperture is very tempting.
3. Might not be as versatile as the 10-24 having 21, 24, 28, and 35 all in one lens.
4. The price difference is negligible (less than 75 USD) in my country for the 14 2.8 and 10 - 24. So for about 75 USD more, I can get the zoom
This will be my first ever zoom since my 18-135 on my Nikon D700 a few years ago, started using primes and never looked back, however now that I will be travelling, the versatility just seems like such a boon. I have my X100S, 35, and 56 for when I need to get my fix