[QUOTE
Came here to see folks reaction to the camera and nothing....maybe you're all out shooting with it rather than gabbing about it on here.

But I'm not so sure yet.
So do any of our membership own one?
If so, how goes it?
If not, why?[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I don't own one but you'll see a good review in the new edition of Whatdigitalcamera magazine.
There are many cameras that will trump the X2 in every way, speed, features, rear screen quality etc for much less money and, will give you the ability to capture video too. So it really boils down too whether this is your way into the
Leica brand or not. Personally I like the look of the X2, and the fact it's only a stills camera, but I'd go for the X100 (or the next version due soon going by the rumours)
sony's nex range of cameras and the Olympus OM-D are better value not only in price and features but it will depend on whether you want aps-c or a 4/3rds sensor camera. If its a camera in the same style as the X2, then go for the Fuji – it'll be a little frustrating at first to get used too especially as its a fixed wide angle lens – but, as I said, I haven't tried it so I'm only able to say from what I have read in reviews and users stories.
Finally, if it's to get a way into Leica ownership, I'd steer you to the LX-5 ( or the up and coming replacement ) as a less expensive and more flexible way into Leica. It's compact, with a good quality lens, can do video and has different ratios to the pictures taken 1x1, 4x3 etc etc. I had one before I got my M9 and really enjoyed it and it's half the price too. But if your willing to spend the money I'd say try the Fuji X-Pro1 as its one sweet camera, not without it's foibles, but gives great handling with its eye viewfinder and manual controls and it has some fine lenses. Either way, let us know what you decide and enjoy whatever you go for. Maybe a user will chime in with the experiences soon.
Cheers, Macjim.