Is it conceivable that the lowly E-PL1 delivers the sharpest and most detailed images of all the PENS?
To my eyes the camparometer at
Imaging Resource "Comparometer" ™ Digital Camera Image Comparison Page
shows the E-PL1 delivers a slightly more detailed image than the E-PM1 or E-P3:
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/new/comparoa.jpg
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/comparob.jpg
Likewise the studio comparison feature at dpreview
Studio shot comparison: Digital Photography Review
shows the E-PL1 delivers a more detailed image
than the E-PM1 and E-P3 and also very slightly more
detailed than the E-PL3:
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/new/dprb.jpg
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/new/dprc.jpg
Curious that the E-PL3 did better than the E-P3 and E-PM1 considering these three PENS were all supposed to have identical IQ.
To my eyes the camparometer at
Imaging Resource "Comparometer" ™ Digital Camera Image Comparison Page
shows the E-PL1 delivers a slightly more detailed image than the E-PM1 or E-P3:
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/new/comparoa.jpg
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/comparob.jpg
Likewise the studio comparison feature at dpreview
Studio shot comparison: Digital Photography Review
shows the E-PL1 delivers a more detailed image
than the E-PM1 and E-P3 and also very slightly more
detailed than the E-PL3:
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/new/dprb.jpg
http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/uu87/4ALC/new/dprc.jpg
Curious that the E-PL3 did better than the E-P3 and E-PM1 considering these three PENS were all supposed to have identical IQ.