so the X100S became a luxury I couldn't justify.
I have to think this is a biggee for a lot of folks. I know it's happened to me several times on photo gear and audio gear and I'm sure it will happen again...soon!
so the X100S became a luxury I couldn't justify.
Mine is going NOWHERE! I adore this camera. It'll be a keeper as long as I have breath in my body. I was taking some shots of my wife the other day and I blurted out
"I love you, I worship you"
"Honey, that's a nice thing to say"
"No, no.....I was talking to the camera"
I still love it, even after the 6 hour operation to remove it from my rear end!
Well, here in Melbourne the X100s is as scarce as hen's teeth. None of the major stores have any in stock, so I have been placed on a waiting list for mine. The store told me that it would be about three weeks. I can't wait. As for price competition, the best I could get was $50 below RRP. One store had their price set at $100 more than RRP.
As someone who pre-ordered the X100S, used it for 6 months and recently sold it, I can only speak for myself and I'm sure my experience was somewhat atypical, but I simply didn't care for the look of the files, preferring those of my 5DII, for what I like to shoot. The X100S itself is a wonderful camera and I haven't enjoyed shooting with a camera as much since my Olympus OM-1 SLR, but it was, as said above, a pretty expensive luxury to keep around, especially for that reason only. I sold mine locally (for about a $200 loss), but it took a while as there wasn't nearly as much interest as I expected there to be. That said, I'm plenty happy to have basically rented it for 6 months for a reasonable price. I'd definitely consider picking up an X100 in the future (I'll wait to see what the rumoured firmware update holds), but for now I picked up a 40mm f2.8 to use on my 5DII as an inexpensive way to hold me over.
As an owner of 5DM2 and many L and one Zeiss lenses (2/35), I second your opinion on the lack of IQ and "characters" on the X100S pictures. They require much more post-processing to bring out the 'pop' I'm used to.
For me it wasn't a lack of IQ or character to the images, it was more about the general look of the files (particularly those that included a lot of foliage, subjects at a distance, or photos taken with a polarizer). I never found a lack of 'pop' as you say - in fact, perhaps I found the opposite and as such I felt the photos tended to look a bit unnatural or more like an illustration or painting than a photograph. For close up subjects, portraits and general candids I was quite pleased - but $1,300 is a lot of money for a camera to only use in those situations, which was my justification for selling it despite really enjoying shooting with it.
Good info, and not the first time Ive heard this about the "look" of the photos...even more of a reason why I'm glad I got the original X100 on the used market...