Fuji XP90 with a little Luminar magic . . .

Jock Elliott

Hall of Famer
Location
Troy, NY
Storm clouds over Troy, NY, taken back at the end of June, from the car . . . I started fussing with these images with Luminar 3.

Before:

XP90 storm clouds over Troy 006.JPG
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

After:

XP90 storm clouds over Troy 006B-001.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Before:

XP90 storm clouds over Troy 007.JPG
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


After:

XP90 storm clouds over Troy 007B-001.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)

Before:

XP90 storm clouds over Troy 008.JPG
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


After:

XP90 storm clouds over Troy 008B.jpg
Join to see EXIF info for this image (if available)


I am not much impressed with the XP90, but Luminar helps some.

Cheers, Jock
 
With my Ricoh PX waterproof compact, I used to set the jpegs to minimum everything (contrast, saturation, sharpness), and it'd actually give me very decent results after fairly little postprocessing.
 
With my Ricoh PX waterproof compact, I used to set the jpegs to minimum everything (contrast, saturation, sharpness), and it'd actually give me very decent results after fairly little postprocessing.

I agree - if I remember correctly I did it similarly on my Pentax MX1.

Guess these days I prefer little to no sharpening and softer contrast in general (no matter which camera). With m43 I often do raw conversions with no low noise reduction and no sharpening - the lenses are sharp enough.

On these photos, I actually kind of like the look of the unprocessed ones - with all their softness - makes them look more "watery" I guess :)
 
Back
Top